The key difference between ECM and GFS last weekend and early this week as I recall, was that ECM seemed to be more keen on the idea of a pressure build over the UK to some degree, followed by a rise in pressure to the east. Maybe my recollection is letting me down, but I don't remember GFS buying into the same scenario much if at all during the same period; it's solution was a fall in pressure to the NW and a westerly or south-westerly airstream becoming established early next week. OK, it didn't at any time go for a return to zonality as such, but it seemed less keen on the idea of HP being dominant over the UK and certainly didn't seem interested in any notion of an easterly.
Quite agree David. I'm not one for cherry picking charts, only if they look interesting from a weather point of view. ECM has been leading the way over the last two weeks or so, with GFS playing catch up, maybe as the weather is coming from a more european point of view!
There are a number who comment on a chart and say it like it "will" happen, like it is definite. Okay its what the chart is showing at the time, but all charts change, they are forecasts. I wish they could add the words suggest or equivalent. I am sure this may dumb down the antagonistic tone some posts come over as. Not up to me what they write but they want to try it and sure they would receive less negative comments themselves, unless they are baiting and what they wish for.
Back OT, and GFS flip flopping temps from its previous run at 120. Could be true, of course!
Edited by user
13 January 2017 16:14:45
|
Reason: Not specified