You're not looking at the whole data though. What it shows is that if you're elderly and get it, you're at serious risk. If you're younger then the risk is much less, unless you have an underlying condition or are unlucky enough to have whatever it is that causes a cytokine storm.
And if you're under 30, or 40 (the line is a bit vague) then you won't show up on the test at all, as you won't have used antibodies to clear the virus in the first place.
The results are clear: shield the old, maintain distancing etc and the youngsters will slowly but surely continue to build immunity.
(EDIT: And your post shows well the folly of using averages in a massively skewed distribution. Just as a few people earning a million+ a year will skew the average much higher in terms of average earnings, so too the CFR is skewed by the massive bias towards elderly people. You should instead look at CFR by age).
Originally Posted by: Retron