The marathon comment was Qs not mine 😉
I'd have to look back through the thread/s for the older stuff but the theme of HP establishing towards Greenland around 7th Feb has been remarkably consistent for several days (I was saying much as I did today back on 25th Jan). I generally view the issue with some model commentary that low chances of cold get amplified as the models are showing a cold spell, when the overall output suggests otherwise. The cold stragglers we had for the start of Feb being a good example - that *never* got close to being more likely than not but was used to suggest another backtrack by some posters when said stragglers moved back in line with the majority.
I'd be surprised if the HP build bit doesn't happen, as it's been so consistently shown and is counting down towards the reliable. I am not confident that will lead to countrywide cold but again on the balance of the output we can see, I think it's a good chance.
Other's are free to interpret the models differently of course, but it does rather go against the spirit of the thread if the output is dismissed or ignored because it's FI and may change or because our climatology suggests it's a less likely outcome.
Originally Posted by: Hippydave