You only have to read some of the responses in here to what you have written to understand why the media circus write these things. Some are simply incapable of rational/ reasonable thought.
Spitting in someone's face for no good reason is vile! But you are right to ask what evidence is there that this is what gave this lady CV? How do they know that she wasn't already infected, or that it wasn't subsequently picked up after the incident? In any court of law these would be basic questions that would need to be answered.
I noticed gooner didn't get the stick for saying similar.
What evidence is there to directly link the alleged attack to her death.
Circumstantial but the time scale made it feasible
We don't even know the attacker actually had CV or if there was more context not disclosed.
What context would have made it ok?
I really wonder why any newspaper reports in this way, are they trying to increase tension or what.
Why wouldn't any Newspaper report this incident, let alone the person dying later
It's actually rather sinister what they will do for clicks.
Why is it sinister to report a despicable act?
He got called out because it was insensitive and appeared to be finding reasons why it wasn't newsworthy.