| 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | 2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 |
| 11.24 | 11.53 | 11.44 | 13.83 | 10.55 | 10.06 | 11.31 | 10.02 |
| 5.29 | 4.85 | 4.75 | 6.84 | 6.12 | 3.22 | 2.30 | 3.39 |
Just out of interest I've produced these figures which show the mean temperature across September, October and November in the middle row and the mean temperature across the following December, January and February in the bottom row, these being for my own location.
The mildest Autumn was followed by the mildest winter, agreeing with the point made by Roger above. Then, however, we can see that the second mildest winter followed on from the third coldest Autumn here. The coldest Autumn did lead to the third coldest winter, however, this being a pretty chilly one at that, mostly due to that extraordinary December of 2010. The coldest winter of all followed a middle-ground Autumn, suggesting little of much worth.
Obviously, the data source is way too small and locallised to be able to determine the existence or not of a pattern that is fairly weak on the much wider scale. At least the strong relationship between very mild Autumns and mild winters is supported. Little insight can be offered regarding the relationships elsewhere, but this has been an interesting venture for me nonetheless 
Currently Autumn looks cold according to a number of sources that I've seen over the past month or so (IRI for one: http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/forecast/net_asmt/2011/jul2011/images/SON11_Eur_temp.gif and then the CFS posted earlier for another) so the liklihood of a cold winter could be viewed to be higher than 50% on that regard alone. If only it were that simple.
Originally Posted by: Stormchaser