Although evolution in some aspects is another can of worms, chicken, egg and all that.
It's interesting that a number of people very prominent in their refutal of the idea human activity affects climate, also refute evolution.
Coincidence?
Edit: btw, the order is worm, egg, chicken
Evolution cannot be refuted as it's an ongoing process, what is debatable is the origins of man. No concrete proof either way I'm afraid. Oh dear I've got an awful feeling this is going the way of many debates on here, round and round and round and round, stop now I want to get off!!
Stick with it Cycles.
Some here, are experts at thread wrecking if they don't like your opinions.
Watch out for the Deep Green Brigade.
At least one should post here soon with indignation.
,Don't let them get you down.I think they are generally known to most posters here as pains in the you know what?.
Edited by user
16 July 2011 19:38:46
|
Reason: Not specified