It does baffle me when people treat potential signals deep in FI as gospel, like it is inevitable it will happen. Who exactly needs an apology? Even if we get a less settled, more average second half of July we'll still be comfortably above the average CET. Moomin's cooler July just isn't going to happen. A cooler second-half of July is possible, perhaps even likely if we get a less-favourable blocking high, but then it is not at all a stretch to predict that given how warm/hot the first half is looking nationally.
When I read longer-term analysis from very knowledgeable posters and forecasters (like the longer-range Met outlook, etc), they emphasis the uncertainty, because small changes in the pattern can make a huge difference to our little island in terms of rainfall distribution and where the warmest conditions will be. We're struggling for any real consistent signal into next week, with the usual suspects taking every operational as a given with knee-jerk posts (over on NW forums too) so why on Earth are we writing off the second half of the month if the models can't even resolve next week?
We're going to see a number of different options ahead for next week and beyond. Operationals are going to be all over the place; some hot outliers that need treating with caution, some cooler outliers like last night's GFS 18z, that have caught a few out that should know better. Ensembles are only going to be so much help because of the scatter into FI, and the ECM clusters may well play around with a few scenarios in the longer term as well. It's going to be fascinating and frustrating to try and pin down how we go forward from this forthcoming heatwave (that we need to not lose sight of and enjoy!), but it's safe to say it won't be as bad as some will have you think (note, average is not bad!).
Originally Posted by: Steel City Skies