No, I would not have berated a post like that as long as it was based on facts and proper reasoning. IMO, anyone claiming they know with any certainty at this time what the weather will be like through all four weeks of Feb is not based on any facts or reasoning. It is based on nothing other than a hunch which may or may not turn out to be what happens in reality. I shall refer you to the post that Michael (Doc) made in response to Moomin earlier. There is reasonably good agreement now than there will not be any cold of note in the first 10-14 days of the month, but beyond that we don't yet know with any certainty. I don't see why it is unreasonable to say that much
I have never said that me or anyone else plucking individual examples of past late cold spells, be it the one last year or other late winter cold spells from the last 15 years, makes the same thing happening this time any more likely. At the same time though, it doesn't make it any less likely either. Yes, the models don't look great for cold generally at this moment in time- that much is true. However, anyone who has followed the model output regularly for any length of time must know that sometimes, the models can be as fickle as the weather itself often is. See the example from Feb 2005 which I mentioned in my reply to Moomin earlier.
By the way, for the avoidance of doubt I am not saying that the models will do a Feb 2005-style turnaround this time- they may not. But it shouldn't IMO be competely discounted at this time.
Originally Posted by: David M Porter