After about a week of testing, I'm finding the temperature reading to be significantly more accurate than the VP2. I think the reason is that it adjusts dynamically using an algorithm that takes into account solar radiation and wind speed. My manually aspirated VP2 over reports temperatures in strong summer sunshine and light winds.
Originally Posted by: Brian Gaze
TBH that's a proper turn-off, the meteorological version of "AI" adjusting photos taken with the Google camera app. There's a massive difference between a photo of something "AI" struggles with (i.e a wolf's fur) taken with a 5x optical zoom on my phone vs the same taken with my bridge camera - it goes all mushy and ill-defined with Google's app as the optical accuracy isn't there.
And so it is with the VP2 versus the WittBoy. TBH if you're relying on algorithms to "correct" the reading you may as well not bother at all, just interpolate from the official stations!
FWIW my VP2 used to overread by a fair bit too, unsurprising considering the shield, good though it is, won't be a patch on a proper Stevenson screen. I bought a fan kit for mine and it is more accurate as a result. It still won't be as good as a properly screened thermometer, but hey-ho.
EDIT: I have a PC running Cumulus for my VP2 - it also runs the wolf centre website (old-school, I know). Cumulus uploads to Wunderground and WOW, so I have access to data "on the go" and more detailed logs via Cumulus.
Edited by user
13 July 2026 12:31:44
|
Reason: Not specified