More to do with the pattern IMO - if you collapse HP south too quickly due to modelling the jet a bit off due to lack of data, then you're more likely to allow milder air in far too quickly, might have the jet angle wrong so it pushes mild air further NE than it should etc. The lack of data isn't causing the model to under or over estimate the air temperature, it's just causing (or maybe causing) an incorrect modelling of the wider pattern such that the end pattern is one in which milder air is brought in.
Given the current wandering HP setup has often been a tweak away from cold or mild, it's not overly surprising that a change in how the jet is modelled could tip it towards a milder setup too quickly or too conclusively. That's been and presumably still is being played out in the ens and tweaks to starting positions.
Entirely possible I'm wrong of course, but that's my take on what may have happened - it's certainly a little suspicious that we had 2 days of runs which were seemingly increasingly keen on collapsing the HP fairly quickly and then we're back with a more robust HP hanging around for longer and bringing the chance of repeated Northerly incursions.
Originally Posted by: Hippydave