Yup! we'll never 'control' climate (as mother N. does) but we do impact upon it.
We're not the only organism to have wrought changes on our planet.......check out who gave us this much oxygen......
I am aware of the line you are taking GW and appreciate your point.It took a long time to poison the atomoshere with O2.
CO2 as the main climate driver is a factored ,modeled political Hoax imo.
I would be happy to blame CO2 for climate change but show me the proof.Not some jumped up theory supported by selected ipcc scientists.Let's not beat around the bush ,they are employed.
This whole farce thing is driven by money imho.(THE COLLAPSE OF THE CARBON MARKET IS IT'S DEATH KNELL)and before anybody starts???,my opinion is my own, I am not watts or iceage influenced or biased towards warmists or coolist blog sites
Time to get back to Earth and deal with the real issues and stop wasting time on this silly HOAX..
btw. Gray. (Hope you and your crew are well)
Aim, you are entitled to your opinion.
I do think people using words like hoax leaves others with that classic dilemma - respond in kind or let the slurr (because to people like me it IS a slurr (be it your opinion or not)) to call what I know to be true a hoax. CO2 is (that's IS) a ghg with a well known and understood effect. You might as well call the water vapour effect a hoax. Is that proof enough? No I don't think it is, and tbph, I can't see there is anything that might sway a view of the GH effect like yours.
Anyway, I ask you, what should I do? Respond in kind or let the slurr pass? Put my opinion as forcefuly as you do? Sometimes I do, but I'd rather debate without the emotion, rhetoric and invective - honest
I do know that the science wont change your mind (for the reasons you've given) but can you at least stop using such languge towards other people's views? You are one (I know the others who definitely wont) here who might respond to such a request
Please.
"When it takes nearly 900,000 votes to elect one party’s MP, and just 26,000 for another, you know something is deeply wrong."
The electoral reform society, 14,12,19