The cold theme is unchanged; but the synoptics, run by run, are changing every time and sometimes dramatically after T144, and because of the various and complex atmospheric influences that few (even experts) truly understand, are currently varying more than even we are used to.
I’m sure I am not the only member here irritated by comments made on a single model’s run with unremitting and somewhat tiresome bias, either cold or mild. I know its been suggested before but perhaps its now time to split this discussion between thoughtful commentary on longer term, perhaps week-long threads on “Model Output Trends” and also have a seperate thread, 4 times a day, for each (GFS) model run for those whom wish to make “oh yes it is” or “oh no it isn’t” or “isn’t it a disaster/terrible/I’m never going to trust the models again” comments?
I really enjoy reading the thoughtful, balanced and informed commentary. And we all know whom those people are. We also know whom posts every 2 minutes, sparring with each other. Over the years we have lost a number of the former group, politely departing, perhaps because of the latter.
I’ve been on this Forum 11 years but have posted infrequently having neither the interest in sparring nor the deep knowledge to genuinely inform. So please see these comments as trying to be positive and constructive. With split threads, everyone can then have their say, and say what they wish to within the governance rules, and perhaps have a happier and more popular Forum.
Jeff
Originally Posted by: Jeff