Remove ads from site
Big question for the legal eagles out there - I'm assuming Hicks' injunction has effectively scuppered the Red Sox purchase until Oct 25 at least. Another big question - does RBS call in its loan in the meantime? Interesting times ahead.
SEMerc wrote:
Hopefully. Send us into administration, then RBS can simply sell their asset.
Give a great big middle finger to that stinking shitheap that's called American 'justice'
Martin
Home: St Helens (26m asl) Work: Manchester (75m asl)
A TWO addict since 14/12/01
"How can wealth persuade poverty to use its political freedom to keep wealth in power? Here lies the whole art of Conservative politics."
Aneurin Bevan
Saint Snow wrote:
The other question of course is whether a Texas District Court has jurisdiction in say Massachusetts.
Now the Chilean crisis is over it looks like we've got live blogging in relation to the Liverpool situation
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2010/oct/13/liverpool-sale-high-court-verdict-live
40m asl
Perhaps no jurisdiction, but RBS does business there, and we all know what that could mean...
Sunderland fans feeling all warm and fluffy about Liverpool.
http://www.readytogo.net/smb/showthread.php?t=531217
He can't be a real Sunderland fan if he is saying as much as the Mags, it's always nearly as much as the mags
Stockton-on-Tees
So, basically, if Statler and Waldorf don't back down by 4PM Friday they face arrest should they set foot in the UK. I guess they won't be holidaying here in the near future should they attempt to take on the High Court.
http://www.mailonsunday.co.uk/sport/football/article-1320651/High-Court-judge-crushes-Tom-Hicks-George-Gillett-clear-way-Red-Sox-takeover.html
Round and round we go. Hicks is now reported to be on the verge of handing over his shares to Mill Financial, who would then presumably pay off RBS and take us back to square one.
It looks like the takeover at Liverpool is finally complete.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/9094283.stm
icegooner wrote:
Although G&H seem hellbent on getting something. Now they're bringing a lawsuit against the club
TBFTEIARBSC
Man U couldnt hold onto a lead if their lives depended on it...shocking. WBA totally desrving their point.
remember these from sky sports - great title sequence and tune from the early to mid 1990's
Sunday afternoon
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gXK8mMLk_NE&feature=related
Monday Night
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfRGWPZNGo0&feature=related
Sedgley, West Midlands ( just south of Wolverhampton )
162m ASL
Reo Coker just missed a one on one in time added on against Chelsea
Villa 0 Chelsea 0
Marcus
Banbury
North Oxfordshire
378 feet A S L
Arsenal 2nd , 5pts behind Chelsea. Wenger will be annoyed with the 3pts dropped at home to WBA as SAF will be for the 2pts dropped today
Good win for Spurs today, even if their winner was dodgy. Well worth the victory.
After watching M O T D, I am not that sure it was dodgy. Yes a damn good result away at Fulham
Aw, Sir Alex Ferguson bless. He's interested in bringing Modric and Huddlestone to Old Trafford and would use Carrick and Anderson in part exchange. I'm sure Redknapp and Levy will find it funny too.
http://www.caughtoffside.com/2010/10/16/manchester-united-consider-player-part-exchange-for-32m-tottenham-pair/
Just saw that on the BBC Gossip Column. I've said before that CaughtOffside is the football gossip equivalent of a GFS +384 chart, but I reckon they're just taking the p*ss here.
I have been banging on about Modric since the end of last season... he was the one player i really liked and would add another dimension to Man U... History will tell us if Man U want the player(s) (not sure on huddlestone) that they will pay a hugely over inflated price to Spurs !!!
future_is_orange wrote:
Oh, I've no doubt SAF is interested in Modric - that is well known and (maybe) Huddlestone. To be honest, Modric is not back to his best form yet and has been eclipsed, so far, by Van Der Fart. Huddlestone meanwhile is in the form of his life. He's that rare player who can play in the back four, as a holding midfielder or a creative midfielder.
The question is whether SAF has the sort of dosh Spurs would want. I doubt it, which would explain using Carrick and Anderson in part exchange. But that would be utterly pointless because neither player would get into the Spurs first team.
As Saint says, the story is probably a joke anyway. Caughtoffside is the web equivalent of Talk Scheisse.
I wouldnt laugh about it, Man U and Spurs have a history of dealings, and Man U are still a bigger club than Spurs , players would think seriously about going up North. Spurs would get quite a bit of dosh as well, the board wouldnt think twice
Gooner wrote:
That may all be true. Take the dosh by all means. But a part exchange deal that would weaken the team? I think not.
Gerrard's a dirty little finker. If he carries on like this he'll be off.
The worst 30 minutes of football I've seen from Liverpool in my whole life. The definition of a relegation candidate.
A 30 minutes which has now been properly punished.