WUWT has been known to make mistakes but they soon get ignored in the comment section.

Corrected   

Of course the thing with blogs is that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider facts or truth - but if you tell people what they want to hear, you can convince them of anything

WUWT has been known to make mistakes but they soon get ignored in the comment section.

 

Corrected   

Of course the thing with blogs is that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider facts or truth - but if you tell people what they want to hear, you can convince them of anything

WUWT has been known to make mistakes but they soon get ignored in the comment section.

 

Corrected   

Of course the thing with blogs is that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider facts or truth - but if you tell people what they want to hear, you can convince them of anything

Can we include the IPCC in that as well! 

I really don't think we could include the IPCC as a blog site.

But I do think they want to hear some of the things they are listening out for, rather than taking a neutral approach.imo.

I'll probably get bashed for even questioning the ethics of the IPCC.Honest as I belive they are.

But mabey needing to be a bit more open to unconventional science for want of a better expression.

WUWT has been known to make mistakes but they soon get ignored in the comment section.

 

Corrected   

Of course the thing with blogs is that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider facts or truth - but if you tell people what they want to hear, you can convince them of anything

Can we include the IPCC in that as well! 

Hi SC.

I really don't think we could include the IPCC as a blog site.

But I do think they want to hear some of the things they are listening out for, rather than taking a neutral approach.imo.

I'll probably get bashed for even questioning the ethics of the IPCC.Honest as I belive they are.

But mabey needing to be a bit more open to unconventional science for want of a better expression.