TheWeatheroutlook
Welcome Guest! To enable all features please Login or Register.

Notification

Icon
Error

37 Pages«<353637
Essan Offline
#721 Posted : 23 April 2011 09:23:42(UTC)
Essan

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 05/04/2006(UTC)
Posts: 14,706
Antarctica
Location: in a cave ... Evesham, Worcs

Originally Posted by: Stephen Wilde Go to Quoted Post

WUWT has been known to make mistakes but they soon get ignored in the comment section.

 

Corrected   

Of course the thing with blogs is that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider facts or truth - but if you tell people what they want to hear, you can convince them of anything

Andy

Weather & Earth Science News

"Getting entangled with humans clouds the thinking" - Death

Walk the Worcestershire Way - 29 June 2013 - in aid of Vasculitis UK
Solar Cycles Offline
#722 Posted : 23 April 2011 11:29:49(UTC)
Solar Cycles

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 04/09/2008(UTC)
Posts: 3,677
Location: Blackburn Lancs

Originally Posted by: Essan Go to Quoted Post

Originally Posted by: Stephen Wilde Go to Quoted Post

WUWT has been known to make mistakes but they soon get ignored in the comment section.

 

Corrected   

Of course the thing with blogs is that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider facts or truth - but if you tell people what they want to hear, you can convince them of anything

Can we include the IPCC in that as well! 

AIMSIR Offline
#723 Posted : 23 April 2011 17:52:44(UTC)
AIMSIR

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 04/01/2008(UTC)
Posts: 5,729
Man
Location: Dublin

Originally Posted by: Solar Cycles Go to Quoted Post

Originally Posted by: Essan Go to Quoted Post

Originally Posted by: Stephen Wilde Go to Quoted Post

WUWT has been known to make mistakes but they soon get ignored in the comment section.

 

Corrected   

Of course the thing with blogs is that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider facts or truth - but if you tell people what they want to hear, you can convince them of anything

Can we include the IPCC in that as well! 

Hi SC.

I really don't think we could include the IPCC as a blog site.

But I do think they want to hear some of the things they are listening out for, rather than taking a neutral approach.imo.

I'll probably get bashed for even questioning the ethics of the IPCC.Honest as I belive they are.

But mabey needing to be a bit more open to unconventional science for want of a better expression.

 

Edited by user 23 April 2011 17:58:09(UTC)  | Reason: Not specified

Solar Cycles Offline
#724 Posted : 24 April 2011 08:06:12(UTC)
Solar Cycles

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 04/09/2008(UTC)
Posts: 3,677
Location: Blackburn Lancs

Originally Posted by: AIMSIR Go to Quoted Post

Originally Posted by: Solar Cycles Go to Quoted Post

Originally Posted by: Essan Go to Quoted Post

Originally Posted by: Stephen Wilde Go to Quoted Post

WUWT has been known to make mistakes but they soon get ignored in the comment section.

 

Corrected   

Of course the thing with blogs is that there is no reason whatsoever to even consider facts or truth - but if you tell people what they want to hear, you can convince them of anything

Can we include the IPCC in that as well! 

Hi SC.

I really don't think we could include the IPCC as a blog site.

But I do think they want to hear some of the things they are listening out for, rather than taking a neutral approach.imo.

I'll probably get bashed for even questioning the ethics of the IPCC.Honest as I belive they are.

But mabey needing to be a bit more open to unconventional science for want of a better expression.

 

Aye, I was being a litle mischievous Aimsir, though I agree entirely on your point regarding the IPCC. Too political for it's own good IMO!

Users browsing this topic
Guest
37 Pages«<353637
Forum Jump  
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.